Legal Guide LT-2 California Consumer Affairs Department
HOW OFTEN CAN A LANDLORD RAISE RENT?
October 1996
Usually">
Legal Guide LT-2 California
Consumer Affairs Department HOW OFTEN CAN A LANDLORD RAISE RENT? October 1996 Usually, landlords can increase rent as
often as they like, so long as the increase is not done to retaliate against a tenant for
exercising a right, is not discriminatory, and proper advance written notice is given.
However, local rent control ordinances may impose additional restrictions such as the
amount of the rent increase. Also, if you have a lease, your rent cannot be increased
during the term of the lease, unless allowed by the lease.1 Increases in rent for government-financed
housing usually also are restricted. Check with your local public housing authority to
find out about the specific restrictions. Separate laws cover rent increases for
mobilehome parks. Call 1-800-952-5275 to obtain a copy of the laws that apply to
mobilehome parks. How much advance notice must a tenant
receive? If your landlord wants to increase your
rent, she or he must give you proper advance notice. The notice must be in writing.2 Your landlord must give you advance notice which is at least as
long as the period of time between your rent payments. For example, in a month-to-month
tenancy, the landlord must give you at least 30 days' written notice before a rent
increase can take effect, unless you have agreed to a shorter period in your rental
agreement. If you pay rent every week, a seven-day written notice is required. Notice of
rent increase always must be given at least seven days prior to the date on which the
increase is to take effect. When Do Most Rent Increases Usually Take
Effect? Most notices of rent increase state that
the increase will go into effect at the start of a rental period. For example, a landlord
who wishes to increase the rent on a month-to-month rental effective January 1st, must see
to it that the tenant receives notice by the end of November. However, a landlord can make
the increase effective at any time in the month so long as proper advance notice is given.
Read the notice of rent increase to find out when your particular rent increase will take
effect. If a landlord proposes to increase rent
to become effective in the middle of a rental period, the landlord is entitled to receive
the increased rent for only the later half of the rental period. Let's take the following
facts as an example: Rental period -- month-to-month, from the first day of
the month to the last day of the month. Rent -- $500. Rent increase -- $100 (from $500 to $600). Date of notice of rent increase -- April 15 (that is,
the middle of the month). If the landlord delivers the notice on
April 15, since the rental period is for one month, the increase becomes effective on May
16, and the landlord is entitled to the increase from that date. The tenant would pay
$250 for the first half of May (that is, two weeks at the old rent of $500). When the rent
increase takes effect on May 16, the tenant would pay $300 for the last half of May
(that is, two weeks at the new rent of $600). The total rent for the month would be $550.
Looking at it another way, the landlord is only entitled to one-half of the increase in
the rent since the notice of rent increase became effective in the middle of the month. How should a landlord deliver notice of a
rent increase? Your landlord may serve the required
written notice of rent increase using one of the following methods.
If your landlord does not use one of
these ways, the notice may not be valid. Landlords often simply mail the notices
of rent increase to tenants without doing more. Giving notice only through the mail
generally is not an acceptable delivery method; however, the notice is valid if the tenant
admits receiving the notice, or the landlord shows that the tenant actually received the
notice.5 Therefore, if you receive an otherwise proper notice
of rent increase by mail, it would be wise to honor it. NOTICE: We attempt to make our legal guides accurate as of
the date of publication, but they are only guidelines and not definitive statements of the
law. Questions about the law's application to particular cases should be directed to a
specialist. Prepared by: Legal Services Unit ENDNOTES 1.Colyear v. Tobriner (1936) 7
Cal.2d 735. 2.Civil Code section 827, Code of Civil
Procedure section 1162. 3.The courts have decided that a person who
is 16 years old is of "suitable age and discretion." Lehr v. Crosby
(1981) 123 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 [177 Cal.Rptr. 96]. 4.In contrast with Civil Code sections
governing service of process (Code Civ. Proc. § 415.20(b)), no showing of reasonable
diligence in attempting personal service before utilizing substituted service is required
under Code of Civil Procedure section 1162. Nourafcha v. Minek (1985) 169
Cal.App.3d 746, 750 [15 Cal.Rptr. 450, 453]. 5.Colyear v. Tobriner (1936) 7
Cal.2d 735; University of So. California v. Weiss (1962) 208 Cal.App.2d 759
[25 Cal.Rptr. 475]; Wilcox v. Anderson (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d 593, 597 [148
Cal.Rptr. 773, 775]; Lehr v. Tank (1985) 168 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 6 [177
Cal.Rptr. 96, 99, fn. 3]; Valov v. Tank (1985) 168 Cal.App.3d 867 [214
Cal.Rptr. 546].
Retrieve
the PDF version of this legal guide
DCA Home
Page