Legal Guide LT-3 from the California Dept. of Consumer Affairs
RENTAL HOUSING & REPAIRS:
WHO'S RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT & HOW TO GET REPAIRS MADE
October 1994
A rental unit must be fit to live in;
that is">
Legal Guide LT-3 from the California Dept. of
Consumer Affairs RENTAL HOUSING & REPAIRS: October 1994 A rental unit must be fit to live in;
that is, it must be "habitable." California laws make landlords and tenants each
responsible for certain kinds of repairs, although landlords ultimately are held
responsible for assuring that a rental unit is habitable. What kinds of repairs must a landlord make? Landlords must repair problems which make
a rental unit unfit to live in, or "uninhabitable." Before renting a unit, a
landlord must make the rental unit fit to live in, or "habitable." Additionally,
while the unit is being rented, the landlord must do maintenance work and make repairs
which are necessary to keep the unit livable.1 However, a landlord
is not responsible for repairing damages which were caused by the tenant or the tenant's
family, guests or pets.2 Under the "implied warranty of
habitability," the landlord is responsible for repairing conditions that seriously
affect the rental unit's habitability.3 Whether the landlord or
the tenant is responsible for making less serious repairs is usually determined by the
rental agreement. The law is very specific as to what kinds
of conditions make a rental uninhabitable. These are discussed below. What kinds of repairs must a tenant make? Tenants are required by law to take
reasonable care of their rental units and common areas, such as hallways and outside
areas. That means that a tenant must act to keep those areas in good condition. Tenants
also must repair all damages which result from their neglect or abuse, and must repair
damages caused by anyone for whom they are responsible, such as family, guests or pets.4 What kinds of conditions make a rental unit
legally uninhabitable? There are many kinds of repair problems
which could make a rental unit unlivable. The implied warranty of habitability requires
landlords to maintain their rentals in a condition fit for the "occupation of human
beings."5 In addition, the rental unit must
"substantially comply" with building and housing code standards that materially
affect tenants' health and safety.6 A dwelling may be considered
uninhabitable if it substantially lacks any of the following:7
For example, it is the landlord's
responsibility to fix a leaking roof because the implied warranty of habitability requires
that the roof not leak. But the implied warranty of habitability does not require the
landlord to repair damages that are caused by the tenant's family, guests or pets, or to
clean up trash that is left by tenants or those for whom the tenant is responsible.9 Are there any limitations on the landlord's
duty to keep the rental unit habitable? Yes. Even if one of the conditions listed
above exists and makes the rental unit not livable, a landlord may not be legally required
to repair the condition if the tenant has not fulfilled the tenant's own responsibilities. In addition to generally requiring a
tenant to take reasonable care of the rental unit and common grounds, the law specifically
lists certain things that a tenant must do to keep the rental unit livable. If a tenant
fails to do one of these things, and the tenant's failure has either substantially caused
the unlivable condition to occur, or has substantially interfered with the landlord's
ability to repair the unlivable condition, the landlord has no duty to repair the
condition.10 Tenants must:
However, a landlord may agree in writing
to clean the rental unit and dispose of the trash.11 If the tenant violates these
requirements, the landlord is ultimately responsible for the condition of the rental
unit,and could be prosecuted for violating the building and housing codes. However, the
tenant cannot withhold rent or sue the landlord if the tenant has failed to meet these
requirements.12 Who is responsible for other kinds of
repairs, such as repairs to a refrigerator or washing machine? As to less serious repairs, the rental
agreement may provide for either the tenant or the landlord to fix a particular item.
Items covered by such an agreement --refrigerators, washing machines, parking places or
swimming pools -- are usually considered "amenities," which in their absence do
not render a dwelling unit unfit for living. Such agreements are usually enforceable in
accordance with the intent of the parties. Can a landlord and tenant agree that the
tenant is to make all repairs, of whatever kind? Yes. The landlord and the tenant may
agree in the rental agreement that the tenant is responsible for all repairs and
maintenance, in exchange for a lower rent fee.13 Such an
agreement must be made in good faith, and should be signed by the tenant only if he or she
is able to make all the necessary repairs. Ultimately, the landlord is responsible to the
city, county, or state for maintaining the property as required by state or local law. How can a tenant go about getting repairs
made by the landlord? If a tenant believes that his or her
rental unit needs repairs, and that the repairs are the landlord's responsibility, the
tenant should notify the landlord. Since a rental unit is a business investment, most
landlords want to keep it safe, clean, and attractive. It's best for the tenant to notify
the landlord of damage or defects by both a telephone call and a letter. The
tenant should date the letter and keep a copy for his or her records. The notice should be
sent to the landlord, manager or agent by certified mail (return receipt requested).
Alternatively, the tenant (or a friend) may personally deliver the notice to the landlord,
manager or agent and get a receipt showing that the notice was received. The tenant should
keep the receipt and a copy of the notice. The copy and the receipt will be proof that the
tenant notified the landlord, and also proof of what the notice said. If the landlord doesn't make the
requested repairs, and doesn't have a reasonable justification for not doing so, the
tenant may have one of several remedies, depending on the seriousness of the repairs. Each
of the remedies has its own requirements and risks, so the tenant should use them
carefully. The "repair and deduct" remedy. The "repair and deduct" remedy
allows tenants to deduct money from their rent to pay for repair of conditions that are
covered by the implied warranty of habitability.14 These include
habitability defects that are related to health or safety (such as a leak in the roof
during the rainy season, no hot running water, a gas leak, or a defective sewer system),
that are serious, but that would not cost more than one month's rent to repair. As a practical matter, the repair and
deduct remedy allows a tenant to make needed repairs of serious conditions without filing
a lawsuit against the landlord. Because this remedy involves legal technicalities, the
tenant may want to talk to a lawyer or legal aid society before using it. The basic
requirements and steps for using the repair and deduct remedy are:
Risks: The defects may not be bad enough
to make the rental unit legally uninhabitable. In that event, the landlord can sue the
tenant to recover the money deducted from the rent, or attempt to evict the tenant for
nonpayment of rent. If the tenant deducted money for repairs not covered by the remedy, or
didn't give the landlord proper notice or a reasonable time to make repairs, a court may
order the tenant to pay the full rent even though the tenant paid for the repairs. The landlord may try to evict the tenant
or raise the rent to punish the tenant for using the repair and deduct remedy. This action
is known as a "retaliatory eviction." The law prohibits this type of eviction,
with some limitations.15 The "abandonment" remedy. The law allows a tenant to abandon
(leave) a rental unit that is uninhabitable (that is, the unit has such serious problems
or defects that the tenant's health and safety will be affected).16
This remedy is basically an alternative to the repair and deduct remedy, and has most of
the same basic steps. If the repairs which are needed are so serious that they would cost
more than one month's rent, the tenant might choose to leave the rental unit rather than
using the repair and deduct remedy. If a tenant uses this remedy properly, then once the
tenant has abandoned the rental unit, he or she is not responsible for paying further
rent.17 However, as with the repair and deduct remedy, the
tenant can use the abandonment remedy only if the landlord has violated the implied
warranty of habitability. The basic requirements and steps for
abandoning a rental unit are:
Risks: The defects may not be bad enough
to make the rental unit legally uninhabitable. The landlord may sue the tenant to collect
additional rent or damages. The "rent withholding" remedy. Tenants have another option for getting
repairs made --the "rent withholding" remedy. By law, a tenant is allowed
to withhold (stop paying) some or all of the rent if the landlord does not fix serious
conditions that are covered by the implied warranty of habitability.18 In order for the tenant to withhold rent,
the defects or needed repairs must be more serious than would justify use of the
repair and deduct remedy. The conditions serious enough to justify withholding rent which
were outlined in a California Supreme Court case, Green v. Superior Court,19 are listed below as examples:
In the Green case, all of these
conditions were present, and there also were many violations of the local housing and
building codes. In order to prove a violation of the
implied warranty of habitability, the tenant will need evidence of the needed repairs.
Therefore, if the tenant goes to court, photographs, witnesses, and copies of letters
informing the landlord of the problem would be very helpful. Before the tenant stops paying rent, it
is a good idea to check with a legal aid society, lawyer, or tenant organization to help
determine if this is the appropriate remedy. The basic requirements and steps for using
the rent withholding remedy are:
In addition, if the tenant withholds
rent, the tenant should put the rent money into a special bank account (called an escrow
account). The tenant should notify the landlord in writing that the rent money has been
deposited in the escrow account, and explain why the tenant has done this. Depositing the
withheld rent money in an escrow account is not required by law, but is a very good thing
to do for three reasons. First, depositing the money in an escrow
account will assure that the tenant will have the money to pay reasonable rent once the
repairs are made. Rent withholding cases often wind up in court, as explained under
"Risks" below. Usually, the judge will require the tenant to pay the landlord
some reduced rent based on the value of the rental unit, taking into consideration the
repairs needed for the time that the rent was withheld. Rarely does a judge excuse payment
of all rent. Second, putting the rent money in an
escrow account proves to the court that the tenant didn't withhold the rent just to avoid
paying the rent. If there is a court hearing, the tenant should bring rental receipts or
other evidence to show that he or she has been reliable in paying rent in the past. Third, most legal aid societies and
lawyers will not represent a tenant who has not deposited the withheld rent money in an
escrow account. Hopefully, the tenant and the landlord
will be able to agree on the amount of rent owed for the time when the rental unit needed
repairs. If the tenant and the landlord can't agree on a reasonable amount, the tenant may
need to go to court or use an arbitration or mediation service. Risks: The defects may not be bad enough
to make the rental unit legally uninhabitable. When the tenant withholds rent, the
landlord may give the tenant an eviction notice (a three-day notice to pay the rent or
leave). If the tenant refuses to pay, the landlord will probably sue to evict the tenant.
Then the tenant will have to prove to the court that the landlord violated the implied
warranty of habitability. If the tenant wins the case, the landlord will be ordered to
make the repairs, and the tenant will be ordered to pay a reasonable rent, which must be
paid within a few days. If the tenant wins but doesn't pay the amount of rent ordered when
it is due, the judge will enter a judgment for the landlord and the tenant probably will
be evicted. If the tenant loses, he or she will have to pay the rent and probably will be
evicted. Another risk of using this method is that
if the tenant does not have a lease, the landlord may try to ignore the tenant's request
for repairs and remove or punish the tenant by giving him or her a 30-day notice to move.
This type of eviction is known as a "retaliatory eviction." The law prohibits
this type of eviction, with some limitations.20 Lawsuit for damages as a remedy. The remedies of repair and deduct,
leaving an uninhabitable rental, and rent withholding allow the tenant to take action
against the landlord without filing a lawsuit. However, the tenant may file a lawsuit if
the landlord doesn't make needed repairs in a timely manner.21
If the tenant prevails in this lawsuit, the court may award the tenant actual damages and
"special damages" of not less than $100 and not more than $1,000. Special
damages are costs incurred, such as the rental of a motel room because the landlord failed
to repair an unhabitable unit. Furthermore, the court could order the landlord to abate a
nuisance and to repair any substandard condition which significantly affects the health
and safety of the tenants.22 This could result, for example, in
a court ordering a landlord to fix a leaky roof, with the court retaining jurisdiction
until the roof is fixed. In order to prevail in such a lawsuit,
all of the following criteria must be met:23
Some rental agreements contain provisions
that award attorney's fees to the landlord if the landlord files a lawsuit against a
tenant and wins. Even if the agreement doesn't say it, those same provisions also apply if
the tenant sues the landlord and wins. This means that the landlord could be required to reimburse
the tenant for all or at least some of the cost of hiring a lawyer, or vice versa.24 The tenant can sue in small claims,
municipal or superior court, depending on the amount of the suit. Before filing a lawsuit
the tenant should take these basic steps:
Resolving complaints out of court. Before filing suit, the tenant should
consider having the complaint resolved out of court, through a dispute resolution program.
If the tenant and the landlord agree, a neutral third party will work with both of them to
reach a solution. Dispute resolution is easy, and can be inexpensive and fast. For help
locating a nearby dispute resolution program, call the Department of Consumer Affairs'
Consumer Information Center at (800) 952-5210. NOTICE: We strive to make our Legal Guides accurate as of
the date of publication, but they are only guidelines and not definitive statements of the
law. Questions about the law's application to particular cases should be directed to a
specialist. Prepared by: Legal Services Unit (Revised, October 1994; editorial revisions, June 1996.) ENDNOTES 2. Civil Code section 1941.2(a)(4). 3. Green v. Superior Court (1974) 10
Cal.3d 616 [111 Cal.Rptr. 704]; Hinson v. Delis (1972) 26 Cal.App.3d 62 [102 Cal.Rptr.
661]. 4. Civil Code sections 1929, 1941.2. 6. Green v. Superior Court (1974) 10
Cal.3d 616 [111 Cal.Rptr. 704]. 8. Health and Safety Code sections
17900-17995. 9. Civil Code sections 1929, 1941.2. 10. Civil Code section 1941.2(a). 11. Civil Code section 1941.2(b). 12. Civil Code sections 1929,
1942(c); see Brown and Warner, Landlord's Law Book, Vol. I: Rights & Responsibilities,
p. 11/7 (NOLO Press 1993). 15. Civil Code section 1942.5(a). 16. Groh v. Kover's Bull Pen Inc.
(1963) 221 Cal.App.2d 611 [34 Cal.Rptr. 637]. 17. Green v. Superior Court (1974)
10 Cal.3d 616 [111 Cal.Rptr. 704]. 18. Green v. Superior Court (1974)
10 Cal.3d 616 [111 Cal.Rptr. 704]. 19. Green v. Superior Court (1974)
10 Cal.3d 616 [111 Cal.Rptr. 704]. 20. Civil Code section 1942.5(a). 21. Civil Code section 1942.4. 22. Civil Code section 1942(c). 23. Civil Code section 1942.4(a).
WHO'S RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT & HOW TO GET REPAIRS MADE
Retrieve
the PDF version of this legal guide
DCA Home
Page